Anders Breivik, el asesino confeso de casi un centenar de personas, asegura que siempre actuó solo, pero ha pedido una audiencia pública este lunes para poder explicar sus teorías según las cuales este acto «atroz» era a su juicio «necesario» para desencadenar una reacción europea contra los musulmanes. Ha dejado escrito un manifiesto de más de mil páginas que termina unas horas antes de que estallase el coche-bomba contra el edificio de las oficinas del primer ministro y en el que detalla con trazo grueso sus delirantes teorías. No faltan referencias a todos los países europeos —incluyendo a España— y las críticas a los dirigentes que considera que están traicionando la identidad europea y que han abierto la puerta a una colonización musulmana del continente. Según Breivik, en 2083 culminará su proyecto con una serie de golpes de Estado en todo el continente [...]
Ver notícia no ABC
25 julho, 2011
11 julho, 2011
Falhanço do multiculturalismo, ascensão do terrorismo
Six years ago yesterday, on July 7, 2005, Islamist suicide bombers attacked London's transit system. They blew up three subway trains and a bus, killing 52 people and leaving a nation groping for answers.
Whereas 911 was the work of a foreign terrorist group, 7/7 was the work of British citizens. The question that haunts London is why four men born and brought up in Britain were gripped by such fanatic zeal for a murderous, mediaeval dogma.
The British authorities have expended much effort in seeking to understand how the 7/7 terrorists acquired their perverted ideas and became "radicalised". In the wake of the attacks, much ink was spilled over the role of extremist preachers and radical mosques. More recently, the focus has shifted to universities as recruitment centres for terrorists.
But this obsession with radicalisation misses the point. The real question is why so many young men - who by all accounts are intelligent, articulate and integrated - come to find this violent, reactionary ideology so attractive. To answer it, we need to look not at extremist preachers or university lecturers but also at public policy and, in particular, the failed policy of multiculturalism. [...]
Ver artigo de Kenan Malik no Today online
Whereas 911 was the work of a foreign terrorist group, 7/7 was the work of British citizens. The question that haunts London is why four men born and brought up in Britain were gripped by such fanatic zeal for a murderous, mediaeval dogma.
The British authorities have expended much effort in seeking to understand how the 7/7 terrorists acquired their perverted ideas and became "radicalised". In the wake of the attacks, much ink was spilled over the role of extremist preachers and radical mosques. More recently, the focus has shifted to universities as recruitment centres for terrorists.
But this obsession with radicalisation misses the point. The real question is why so many young men - who by all accounts are intelligent, articulate and integrated - come to find this violent, reactionary ideology so attractive. To answer it, we need to look not at extremist preachers or university lecturers but also at public policy and, in particular, the failed policy of multiculturalism. [...]
Ver artigo de Kenan Malik no Today online
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)